The goal is to include the model name in the agent's comments, alongside existing details like token usage. This will likely require updating the logic that generates the comment footer/metadata.
Plan:
Identify the code responsible for formatting agent comments and token usage.
Add the model name to this metadata.
Verify that the correct model name is passed through to the comment generator.
I'll assign this to @senior as it involves modifying the core agent communication logic.
@ffaerber ready to start building? reply yes to proceed.
details
🔧 0 tool calls · in 9479 · out 118 tokens · subscription
The goal is to include the model name in the agent's comments, alongside existing details like token usage. This will likely require updating the logic that generates the comment footer/metadata.
Plan:
1. Identify the code responsible for formatting agent comments and token usage.
2. Add the model name to this metadata.
3. Verify that the correct model name is passed through to the comment generator.
I'll assign this to @senior as it involves modifying the core agent communication logic.
@ffaerber ready to start building? reply yes to proceed.
<details>
<summary>details</summary>
🔧 0 tool calls · in 9479 · out 118 tokens · subscription
_(no tool calls — text-only reply)_
<sub>tokens — input 9479 (fresh 9479 · cache 0w / 0r) · output 118 · reasoning 0 · **subscription**</sub>
</details>
<!-- 🤖 agent reply — do not trigger -->
🔨 Building on branch ai/issue-92 — I'll open a PR when it's ready.
🔨 Building on branch [`ai/issue-92`](https://git.ffaerber.duckdns.org/gitea/agents/src/branch/ai/issue-92) — I'll open a PR when it's ready.
<!-- 🤖 agent reply — do not trigger -->
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
if a agent makes a comment it include details like token usage.
please also add the model name
The goal is to include the model name in the agent's comments, alongside existing details like token usage. This will likely require updating the logic that generates the comment footer/metadata.
Plan:
I'll assign this to @senior as it involves modifying the core agent communication logic.
@ffaerber ready to start building? reply yes to proceed.
details
🔧 0 tool calls · in 9479 · out 118 tokens · subscription
(no tool calls — text-only reply)
tokens — input 9479 (fresh 9479 · cache 0w / 0r) · output 118 · reasoning 0 · subscription
@pm yes go
Handing off to @senior.
details
🔧 0 tool calls · in 9679 · out 7 tokens · subscription
(no tool calls — text-only reply)
tokens — input 9679 (fresh 9679 · cache 0w / 0r) · output 7 · reasoning 0 · subscription
@senior please proceed with issue #92 per my plan above.
🔨 Building on branch
ai/issue-92— I'll open a PR when it's ready.@pm — PR #93 is ready for review (issue #92).
PR #93 is ready for review. Handing it over to @qa.
details
🔧 0 tool calls · in 9907 · out 25 tokens · subscription
(no tool calls — text-only reply)
tokens — input 9907 (fresh 9907 · cache 0w / 0r) · output 25 · reasoning 0 · subscription
@qa please review PR #93 for issue #92 — put your recommendations on the PR, or approve.
✅ Reviewed PR #93 — looks good.
@pm — I have reviewed and approved PR #93 (issue #92). Over to you.
PR #93 is reviewed and ready to merge, @ffaerber.
details
🔧 0 tool calls · in 10110 · out 17 tokens · subscription
(no tool calls — text-only reply)
tokens — input 10110 (fresh 10110 · cache 0w / 0r) · output 17 · reasoning 0 · subscription