@pm please handle: add a one-sentence clarifying note to the top of README.md saying the workflow is a reusable Gitea Actions workflow. Trivial docs change — recommend a dev and confirm with me first.
@pm please handle: add a one-sentence clarifying note to the top of README.md saying the workflow is a reusable Gitea Actions workflow. Trivial docs change — recommend a dev and confirm with me first.
I will add a one-sentence note to the top of README.md clarifying that the workflow is a reusable Gitea Actions workflow. Since this is a trivial documentation change, @junior is the best fit for this task.
@ffaerber ready to start building? reply yes to proceed.
I will add a one-sentence note to the top of `README.md` clarifying that the workflow is a reusable Gitea Actions workflow. Since this is a trivial documentation change, @junior is the best fit for this task.
@ffaerber ready to start building? reply yes to proceed.
<!-- 🤖 agent reply — do not trigger -->
🔨 Building on branch ai/issue-70 — I'll open a PR when it's ready.
🔨 Building on branch [`ai/issue-70`](https://git.ffaerber.duckdns.org/gitea/agents/src/branch/ai/issue-70) — I'll open a PR when it's ready.
<!-- 🤖 agent reply — do not trigger -->
The diff is summarized but not shown via the API. Let me get the raw content.
Let me get the actual diff for the README:
Now I can see the change clearly. The PR adds 2 lines at the top of README.md:
Before:
# agents
Shared **AI dev-team** workflow for Gitea Actions, reusable across repos. ...
After:
# agents
This repository contains a reusable **Gitea Actions** workflow that other repos invoke from their own caller workflow.
Shared **AI dev-team** workflow for Gitea Actions, reusable across repos. ...
Let me check the PR's CI status:
The change does exactly what the issue asked: adds a one-sentence clarifying note at the top of README.md saying the workflow is a reusable Gitea Actions workflow. The addition is clear, accurate (matches the "Repo layout" section which explains it's workflow_call + invoked via a per-repo caller), and non-redundant — it doesn't duplicate the existing "reusable across repos" sentence in the next paragraph, but rather makes the "reusable" point stand on its own at the very top. No CI is configured for this trivial docs-only change; mergeable: true. @junior was the correct choice for the task.
✅ Reviewed PR #71 — looks good.
The diff is summarized but not shown via the API. Let me get the raw content.
Let me get the actual diff for the README:
Now I can see the change clearly. The PR adds 2 lines at the top of README.md:
**Before:**
```
# agents
Shared **AI dev-team** workflow for Gitea Actions, reusable across repos. ...
```
**After:**
```
# agents
This repository contains a reusable **Gitea Actions** workflow that other repos invoke from their own caller workflow.
Shared **AI dev-team** workflow for Gitea Actions, reusable across repos. ...
```
Let me check the PR's CI status:
The change does exactly what the issue asked: adds a one-sentence clarifying note at the top of `README.md` saying the workflow is a reusable Gitea Actions workflow. The addition is clear, accurate (matches the "Repo layout" section which explains it's `workflow_call` + invoked via a per-repo caller), and non-redundant — it doesn't duplicate the existing "reusable across repos" sentence in the next paragraph, but rather makes the "reusable" point stand on its own at the very top. No CI is configured for this trivial docs-only change; `mergeable: true`. `@junior` was the correct choice for the task.
<!-- 🤖 agent reply — do not trigger -->
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
@pm please handle: add a one-sentence clarifying note to the top of README.md saying the workflow is a reusable Gitea Actions workflow. Trivial docs change — recommend a dev and confirm with me first.
I will add a one-sentence note to the top of
README.mdclarifying that the workflow is a reusable Gitea Actions workflow. Since this is a trivial documentation change, @junior is the best fit for this task.@ffaerber ready to start building? reply yes to proceed.
@pm yes, go ahead.
Handing off to @junior.
@junior please proceed with issue #70 per the plan above (delegated by pm).
🔨 Building on branch
ai/issue-70— I'll open a PR when it's ready.@pm — PR #71 is ready for review (issue #70).
PR #71 is ready for review. Handing over to QA for verification.
@qa please review PR #71 for issue #70 — put your recommendations on the PR, or approve.
✅ Reviewed PR #71 — looks good.
The diff is summarized but not shown via the API. Let me get the raw content.
Let me get the actual diff for the README:
Now I can see the change clearly. The PR adds 2 lines at the top of README.md:
Before:
After:
Let me check the PR's CI status:
The change does exactly what the issue asked: adds a one-sentence clarifying note at the top of
README.mdsaying the workflow is a reusable Gitea Actions workflow. The addition is clear, accurate (matches the "Repo layout" section which explains it'sworkflow_call+ invoked via a per-repo caller), and non-redundant — it doesn't duplicate the existing "reusable across repos" sentence in the next paragraph, but rather makes the "reusable" point stand on its own at the very top. No CI is configured for this trivial docs-only change;mergeable: true.@juniorwas the correct choice for the task.@pm — @qa approved PR #71 (issue #70). Over to you.
PR #71 is reviewed and ready to merge, @ffaerber.