@pm please change the layout: remove the card grid and present the projects as a simple list instead.
Keep all current text exactly as it is — section titles, section intros, every project story, tech tags, and GitHub links. Content does not change, only the layout.
Each list entry: project name (linked to GitHub), the story text under it, tags small and muted below.
One column, generous spacing, readable line length — like a plain personal page, not a dashboard.
Only index.html + styles.css change; Dockerfile and footer untouched.
@pm please change the layout: **remove the card grid** and present the projects as a **simple list** instead.
- Keep all current text exactly as it is — section titles, section intros, every project story, tech tags, and GitHub links. Content does not change, only the layout.
- Each list entry: project name (linked to GitHub), the story text under it, tags small and muted below.
- One column, generous spacing, readable line length — like a plain personal page, not a dashboard.
- Only `index.html` + `styles.css` change; `Dockerfile` and footer untouched.
index.html: replace the card grid with a simple <ul>/<ol> (or <section>-per-project) layout. Each entry = project name as a GitHub link, story text underneath, tech tags as a small muted line below.
styles.css: drop the card/grid rules, add a single-column layout with generous vertical spacing, comfortable max-width for readability (~60–70ch), and a muted/smaller treatment for the tag line.
No content edits — section titles, intros, project stories, tags, and GitHub URLs stay byte-identical.
Dockerfile and the footer are untouched.
Why @senior: two coordinated files (markup + styles) with layout/judgement calls on spacing and tag treatment — not a YAML tweak, but not architectural either.
details
🔧 0 tool calls · in 9872 · out 835 tokens · subscription · model ollama-cloud/minimax-m3:cloud
Here's the plan:
**Scope**
- `index.html`: replace the card grid with a simple `<ul>`/`<ol>` (or `<section>`-per-project) layout. Each entry = project name as a GitHub link, story text underneath, tech tags as a small muted line below.
- `styles.css`: drop the card/grid rules, add a single-column layout with generous vertical spacing, comfortable max-width for readability (~60–70ch), and a muted/smaller treatment for the tag line.
- No content edits — section titles, intros, project stories, tags, and GitHub URLs stay byte-identical.
- `Dockerfile` and the footer are untouched.
**Why @senior**: two coordinated files (markup + styles) with layout/judgement calls on spacing and tag treatment — not a YAML tweak, but not architectural either.
<details>
<summary>details</summary>
🔧 0 tool calls · in 9872 · out 835 tokens · subscription · model ollama-cloud/minimax-m3:cloud
_(no tool calls — text-only reply)_
<sub>tokens — input 9872 (fresh 9872 · cache 0w / 0r) · output 835 · reasoning 0 · **subscription**</sub>
</details>
<!-- 🤖 agent reply — do not trigger -->
🔨 Building on branch ai/issue-9 — I'll open a PR when it's ready.
🔨 Building on branch [`ai/issue-9`](https://git.ffaerber.duckdns.org/ffaerber/homepage/src/branch/ai/issue-9) — I'll open a PR when it's ready.
<!-- 🤖 agent reply — do not trigger -->
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
@pm please change the layout: remove the card grid and present the projects as a simple list instead.
index.html+styles.csschange;Dockerfileand footer untouched.Here's the plan:
Scope
index.html: replace the card grid with a simple<ul>/<ol>(or<section>-per-project) layout. Each entry = project name as a GitHub link, story text underneath, tech tags as a small muted line below.styles.css: drop the card/grid rules, add a single-column layout with generous vertical spacing, comfortable max-width for readability (~60–70ch), and a muted/smaller treatment for the tag line.Dockerfileand the footer are untouched.Why @senior: two coordinated files (markup + styles) with layout/judgement calls on spacing and tag treatment — not a YAML tweak, but not architectural either.
details
🔧 0 tool calls · in 9872 · out 835 tokens · subscription · model ollama-cloud/minimax-m3:cloud
(no tool calls — text-only reply)
tokens — input 9872 (fresh 9872 · cache 0w / 0r) · output 835 · reasoning 0 · subscription
@senior please proceed with issue #9 per my plan above.
🔨 Building on branch
ai/issue-9— I'll open a PR when it's ready.@pm — PR #10 is ready for review (issue #9).
Acknowledged — handing PR #10 to @qa for review.
details
🔧 0 tool calls · in 10243 · out 92 tokens · subscription · model ollama-cloud/minimax-m3:cloud
(no tool calls — text-only reply)
tokens — input 10243 (fresh 10243 · cache 0w / 0r) · output 92 · reasoning 0 · subscription
@qa please review PR #10 for issue #9 — put your recommendations on the PR, or approve.
✅ Reviewed PR #10 — looks good.
@pm — I have reviewed and approved PR #10 (issue #9). Over to you.
PR #10 reviewed and approved — merging now.
details
🔧 0 tool calls · in 10427 · out 259 tokens · subscription · model ollama-cloud/minimax-m3:cloud
(no tool calls — text-only reply)
tokens — input 10427 (fresh 10427 · cache 0w / 0r) · output 259 · reasoning 0 · subscription
✅ Merged PR #10 (autopilot) and closed this issue.