@pm the build-and-push workflow failed on main (run 716): the registry login step gets Get "…/v2/": unauthorized.
Root cause: this Gitea's container registry does not accept the internal Actions token (GITHUB_TOKEN), and packages under ffaerber/* can only be written by ffaerber. A dedicated secret now exists for this: REGISTRY_TOKEN (ffaerber-owned PAT, scope write:package, already verified against the registry).
run-name uses ${gitea.ref_name} which renders literally — use proper ${{ … }} expression syntax or drop the run-name.
After merge, the push to main should produce a green build and the image git.ffaerber.duckdns.org/ffaerber/homepage:latest.
@pm the `build-and-push` workflow failed on main (run 716): the registry login step gets `Get "…/v2/": unauthorized`.
Root cause: this Gitea's container registry does not accept the internal Actions token (`GITHUB_TOKEN`), and packages under `ffaerber/*` can only be written by ffaerber. A dedicated secret now exists for this: **`REGISTRY_TOKEN`** (ffaerber-owned PAT, scope write:package, already verified against the registry).
Required changes to `.gitea/workflows/build.yml`:
1. Login step: `username: ffaerber`, `password: ${{ secrets.REGISTRY_TOKEN }}`.
2. `runs-on: ubuntu-latest` → `runs-on: ci-runner` (this instance's runner label).
3. `run-name` uses `${gitea.ref_name}` which renders literally — use proper `${{ … }}` expression syntax or drop the run-name.
After merge, the push to main should produce a green build and the image `git.ffaerber.duckdns.org/ffaerber/homepage:latest`.
I will update .gitea/workflows/build.yml to use the REGISTRY_TOKEN secret for authentication, switch the runner to ci-runner, and fix the run-name expression syntax. Since these are low-risk configuration changes, @junior will handle the implementation.
@ffaerber ready to start building? reply yes to proceed.
I will update `.gitea/workflows/build.yml` to use the `REGISTRY_TOKEN` secret for authentication, switch the runner to `ci-runner`, and fix the `run-name` expression syntax. Since these are low-risk configuration changes, @junior will handle the implementation.
@ffaerber ready to start building? reply yes to proceed.
<details>
<summary>🔧 0 tool calls · in 9386 · out 79 · subscription</summary>
_(no tool calls — text-only reply)_
<sub>tokens — input 9386 (fresh 9386 · cache 0w / 0r) · output 79 · reasoning 0 · **subscription**</sub>
</details>
<!-- 🤖 agent reply — do not trigger -->
🔨 Building on branch ai/issue-3 — I'll open a PR when it's ready.
🔨 Building on branch [`ai/issue-3`](https://git.ffaerber.duckdns.org/ffaerber/homepage/src/branch/ai/issue-3) — I'll open a PR when it's ready.
<!-- 🤖 agent reply — do not trigger -->
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
@pm the
build-and-pushworkflow failed on main (run 716): the registry login step getsGet "…/v2/": unauthorized.Root cause: this Gitea's container registry does not accept the internal Actions token (
GITHUB_TOKEN), and packages underffaerber/*can only be written by ffaerber. A dedicated secret now exists for this:REGISTRY_TOKEN(ffaerber-owned PAT, scope write:package, already verified against the registry).Required changes to
.gitea/workflows/build.yml:username: ffaerber,password: ${{ secrets.REGISTRY_TOKEN }}.runs-on: ubuntu-latest→runs-on: ci-runner(this instance's runner label).run-nameuses${gitea.ref_name}which renders literally — use proper${{ … }}expression syntax or drop the run-name.After merge, the push to main should produce a green build and the image
git.ffaerber.duckdns.org/ffaerber/homepage:latest.I will update
.gitea/workflows/build.ymlto use theREGISTRY_TOKENsecret for authentication, switch the runner toci-runner, and fix therun-nameexpression syntax. Since these are low-risk configuration changes, @junior will handle the implementation.@ffaerber ready to start building? reply yes to proceed.
🔧 0 tool calls · in 9386 · out 79 · subscription
(no tool calls — text-only reply)
tokens — input 9386 (fresh 9386 · cache 0w / 0r) · output 79 · reasoning 0 · subscription
@pm yes, go ahead.
Handing off to @junior.
🔧 0 tool calls · in 9573 · out 7 · subscription
(no tool calls — text-only reply)
tokens — input 9573 (fresh 9573 · cache 0w / 0r) · output 7 · reasoning 0 · subscription
@junior please proceed with issue #3 per my plan above.
🔨 Building on branch
ai/issue-3— I'll open a PR when it's ready.@pm — PR #4 is ready for review (issue #3).
PR #4 is ready for review. Handing it over to @qa.
🔧 0 tool calls · in 9789 · out 24 · subscription
(no tool calls — text-only reply)
tokens — input 9789 (fresh 9789 · cache 0w / 0r) · output 24 · reasoning 0 · subscription
@qa please review PR #4 for issue #3 — put your recommendations on the PR, or approve.
✅ Reviewed PR #4 — looks good.
@pm — I have reviewed and approved PR #4 (issue #3). Over to you.
PR #4 is reviewed and ready to merge, @ffaerber.
🔧 0 tool calls · in 9983 · out 16 · subscription
(no tool calls — text-only reply)
tokens — input 9983 (fresh 9983 · cache 0w / 0r) · output 16 · reasoning 0 · subscription