@qa's autopilot merge used the built-in Actions token (TOKEN_QA unset -> fell back to GITEA_TOKEN).
Gitea does not fire new workflow runs for pushes made by the built-in Actions token, so the merge
landed on main but deploy.yml never ran — the change was merged-but-not-deployed. Merge with
AGENT_TOKEN (a PAT, already used for delegation and proven to trigger runs) so the push to main
triggers the deploy.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Per maintainer: @qa must never change code — it only accepts a PR or sends it back to the dev with
precise instructions. Replaces the halt-on-any-problem behavior with a bounce loop:
- QA prompt: emit MERGE_PR (approve), or `BOUNCE: @<dev>` after spelling out exactly what to change.
HALT_AUTOPILOT is now only for problems a dev can't fix (needs a human decision).
- publish.sh: on BOUNCE, re-trigger the named dev (via AGENT_TOKEN) with "autopilot fix attempt N/3".
Count prior attempts from the PR thread; at 3 it stops (removes the label) and hands to @ffaerber.
- publish.sh: after a dev pushes a fix (resume), auto-re-trigger @qa to re-verify — closing the loop
(dev fix -> qa re-check -> merge or bounce again).
- Updated the initial @qa trigger wording (bounce, not halt).
Verified: BOUNCE target parsing and the 3-strike counter (attempts 1/3,2/3,3/3 then HALT).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The activity <details> was labelled 'tool calls & reasoning' but included the agent's final prose
summary ('Added the whoami service... Exposed via Traefik... Pushed to branch...'), which is just a
restatement of the PR description and not a tool call. Emit only tool_use events; relabel to
'N tool calls'. The what-changed narrative lives in the PR description; this section is the record of
actions taken.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Batches the remaining comment-noise cleanups on top of the activity-log fix:
- Resume comment no longer re-posts the full PR description (## Summary/## Changes) — the PR body and
diff already carry it; the comment just links the PR (the reasoning trail shows what the run did).
- Strip a leading self-header the model sometimes emits ("🤖 **@pm**" on its own line, sometimes
twice) before we prepend our own, so headers aren't doubled.
- Also drop the BEGIN_PR_DESCRIPTION block from the plain reply text, and simplify the activity
block's summary (it repeated "🤖 **@name** — activity log").
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Merge the activity-log comment into the main reply comment and merge the
sub-issues-created comment into the pm reply, so each agent run posts
exactly one comment (reply + tool calls & reasoning inline).
Stage the shared scripts into $RUNNER_TEMP and point $SCRIPTS there for every
step, so an agent that commits/deletes the in-tree .agents-workflow checkout no
longer destroys the scripts the post-agent steps run (issue #33). Scrub any
in-tree .agents-workflow artifact before publishing, and add a failure-safe
rescue step that opens a PR for pushed work when a run fails.
Rebased onto the per-agent skill-scoping change so PR #25 carries both:
- route.sh keeps the registry 'skills' allow-list and emits skills as a step output
- install-opencode.sh writes the permission.skill block (deny-all + allow listed)
Pure refactor otherwise: each step's shell moves to its own file, called via
bash "$SCRIPTS/<name>.sh". The two extracted SKILL.md bodies are byte-identical to
main; routing/config/publish behavior is unchanged. Because this is a reusable
workflow (workflow_call) the runtime checkout is the caller's repo, so agent.yml now
checks THIS repo out into .agents-workflow/ (pinned @main) and points $SCRIPTS there.
lead
senior